Turfgrass Science Florida Turf Home Pages

Welcome to St. Augustinegrass

 














St. Augustine home

Origins

originics

Production

Publications

Shade

Spray calculator

Frequently Asked Questions

Water

Weeds












Growing wild near the Gulf of Mexico, Highlands Beach, Everglades National Park

St. Augustinegrass*, Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze, had an early distribution in North America, even though the other 6 species of the genus are historically strictly Old World (Sauer, 1972).   Its closest wild relative, pembagrass or S. dimidiatum (L). Brongn., is sometimes used in east Africa for turf.  Some writers have considered St. Augustinegrass to have come from the West Indies.  Nevertheless, plants have not been seen from the West Indies like our naturalized Gulf Coast Group (Busey et al., 1982), either living or as herbarium specimens.  The type specimen of S. secundatum was collected in the Carolinas in the late 1700's, which is consistent with several alternative hypotheses regarding its introduction, or even native status, in North America.
 The earliest recorded use of St. Augustinegrass as turf was in 1880, when it was planted along an avenue at A. M. Reed's plantation near Orange Park, Florida (unpublished Diary of A. M. Reed, J. P. Waterbury, personal communication).  There were more frequent collections of St. Augustinegrass in the 1880's and 1890's from Louisiana and Florida, including non-port areas (e.g., Florida central highlands).  It is likely that during that era the species served as forage.   It grows in remote areas in Everglades National Park, e.g., Highland Beach, 4 days by canoe from the nearest phone or fresh water (see photo; Busey, unpublished observation).  The area was inhabited briefly in the 1890's by people with cattle.
 Before 1920 there were St. Augustinegrass lawns in Davie, Florida and sod trucks were observed in Miami (R. R. Hammer, personal communication).  The common St. Augustinegrass of that era was not marked by a particular name.  Based on plants maintained in breeding collections, a survey of existing lawns (Busey, 1986), and a study of herbarium specimens (Busey, unpublished) there were at least two "common" types.  'Florida Common' had long, purplish internodes on the stolons and purple stigmas, whereas 'Texas Common' of the Gulf Coast Group had green internodes and white stigmas.  St. Augustinegrass sod production in Florida was a matter of stripping out pastures so there was initially little incentive to plant improved cultivars.
 In the mid 1930's, several sod growers (White & Busey, 1987) introduced the 'Bitterblue' cultivar. Although incorrectly believed to be resistant to the southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis Barber, Bitterblue was superior to Florida Common in other respects.  Bitterblue had a deeper blue-green blade color, denser growth, and shorter height.  Bitterblue is very susceptible to gray leaf spot disease caused by Pyricularia grisea (Cke.) Sacc. (Atilano and Busey, 1983), which is still a problem in the production of that cultivar.  A pasture grass, 'Roselawn', was distributed in 1942 and 1943 by Everglades Experiment Station, University of Florida (Allen and Kidder, 1971).  After much Bitterblue was destroyed in Davie, by the hurricane of 1947, ranchers around Lake Okeechobee began to cut Roselawn pastures and sell the product as sod.  As with 'Florida Common', 'Roselawn' has an open habit of growth, is light colored, and does not form a dense sod.
 Concerns about variety purity led the University of Florida to release a Bitterblue-like plant, which was called 'Floratine' (Nutter and Allen, 1960).  Meanwhile, Florida sod producers had a state-sponsored certification program implemented.  Quality assurance was helpful in marketing, by providing the consumer a dependable product.  It also protected against the spread of pest organisms.  In all warm-season turfgrasses there are unresolved questions of cultivar identity, and assurance of cultivar purity is essential for successful breeding development and cultivar adoption to occur.
 In 1973, The University of Florida and Texas A & M University released 'Floratam' (Horn et al., 1973), which is resistant to the southern chinch bug (Reinert and Dudeck, 1974) and to St. Augustine Decline Strain of Panicum Mosaic Virus (PMV-SAD).  The Floratam cultivar spread and became so popular that by 1980-81 it dominated 77% of commercial sod sampled in southeast Florida, and had penetrated 21% of lawn areas (Busey, 1986).
 All the PMV-SAD resistant genotypes, with one exception, are clones with purple stigmas and purple stolons (Bruton et al., 1983).  Likewise, only polyploid St. Augustinegrasses have antibiotic resistance to the southern chinch bug (Reinert et al., 1986), although in some cases the southern chinch bug has adapted to reproduce on and kill Floratam (Busey and Center, 1987).
 O. M. Scotts and Sons contributed significantly towards the development of dwarf St. Augustinegrass cultivars.   Breeding work by T. P. Riordan et al. (1980) resulted in the development of 'Seville' (= S-6-68-516; Plant Patent 4097) and other strains which are under commercial development ('Delmar' = S-6-72-99 and 'Jade' = S-6-72-182).  As a group these plants are more susceptible to drought and to the southern chinch bug than Floratam.  They are also more shade tolerant, lower growing, and more esthetically acceptable to most observers than Floratam.
 Seedhead production is a major problem of some diploid (2n = 18) St. Augustinegrasses, and this can markedly reduce the appearance value of otherwise acceptable Seville, particularly during warm summer months.   Yet there is one strain, Plant Patent 3834 by C. L. Garrett, which has been developed as a seed propagated type.  Seedhead production in St. Augustinegrass is under photoperiod control, but some there are genotypic differences in the dependence on this stimulus (Dudeck, 1974).
 Severe winter-kill occurs to St. Augustinegrass following temperatures of -5 to -10 degrees Centigrade, although in a cold resistance study in Mississippi, temperatures as low as -15 degrees Centigrade were experienced (Wilson et al., 1977).  Floratam has no survival from such cold temperatures, whereas 'Raleigh' has 100% survival.  Raleigh, developed by W. B. Gilbert, North Carolina State University, was released for "commercial trial" in 1980.  Another advantage of Raleigh is its resistance to PMV-SAD (Reinert et al., 1980).  This was an exception to the association of purple stigmas with PMV-SAD resistance, since Raleigh has white stigmas (Busey et al., 1986).  St. Augustinegrass cold damage is related to management, e.g., excessive nitrogen fertilization (12 g N m-2) applied in November and December (Reeves and McBee, 1972),  but the genotype factor is also great.  Sod producers in Texas and northern Florida experienced considerable loss of stand in Floratam due to cold weather, and converted many areas to Raleigh and Texas Common, which was also relatively cold hardy.  Both Texas Common and Raleigh are in the Gulf Coast Group, which is apparently endemic to the United States (Busey et al., 1986).
 Mutation breeding was shown to create favorable variations of St. Augustinegrass (Busey, 1980; Powell and Toler, 1980) while preserving resistance characteristics (Reinert et al., 1981).  No cultivars have resulted from this work in St. Augustinegrass.
 Inconclusive results have been obtained from attempts to measure shade tolerance in St. Augustinegrass (Peacock and Dudeck, 1981; Winstead and Ward, 1974), although Floratam has been shown to be quite intolerant of shade (Barrios et al., 1986).  The general progress of understanding mechanism of environmental adaptation in St. Augustinegrass has been slow, but practical results (e.g., shade tolerance in the Scotts germplasm, and cold tolerance in the Gulf Coast Group) have been encouraging.  These associations, along with similar racial and/or ploidy generalizations for gray leaf spot disease (Atilano and Busey, 1983), lepidopteran larvae damage (Busey et al., 1986), and chinch bug resistance (Reinert et al., 1986), support the idea that "classification should serve as a prospectus of beneficial genes" (Busey et al., 1986).  Certain polyploid introductions from Africa have the ability to survive greatly extended dry periods (months) of no irrigation, provided relatively shallow (1.4 m) groundwater is present (Busey, 1996).  For coastal areas where St. Augustinegrass is commonly used, such a germplasm may have tremendous value.

References

Allen, R. J., Jr., and R. W. Kidder. 1971. Origin and history of Roselawn St. Augustinegrass. Proc. Soil and Crop Sci. Soc. Florida 30:354-360.
Atilano, R. A. and P. Busey. 1983. Susceptibility of St. Augustinegrass germplasm to Pyricularia grisea. Plant Dis. 67:782-785
Barrios, E. P., F. J. Sundstrom, D. Babcock, and L. Leger. 1986. Quality and yield response of four warm-season lawngrasses to shade conditions. Agron. J. 78:270-273.
Bruton, B. D., R. W. Toler, and J. A. Reinert. 1983. Combined resistance in St. Augustinegrass to the southern chinch bug and the St. Augustine decline strain of panicum mosaic virus. Plant Dis. 67:171-172.
Busey, P. 1980. Gamma ray dosage and mutation breeding in St. Augustinegrass. Crop Sci. 20:181-184.
Busey, P. 1986. Morphological identification of St. Augustinegrass cultivars. Crop Sci. 26:28-32.
Busey, P. 1996. Wilt avoidance in St. Augustinegrass germplasm. HortScience 31:1135-1138.
Busey, P., T. K. Broschat, and B. J. Center. 1982. Classification of St. Augustinegrass. Crop Sci. 22:469-472.
Busey, P. and B. J. Center. 1987. Southern chinch bug (Hemiptera:Heteroptera:Lygaeidae) overcomes resistance in St. Augustinegrass. J. Econ. Entomol. 80:608-611.
Dudeck, A. E. 1974. Flowering response of several selections of St. Augustinegrass. p. 74-78. In E. C. Roberts (ed.) Proc. Second Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., Blacksburg, VA. 19-21 June 1973. ASA and CSSA, Madison, WI.
Horn, G. C., A. E. Dudeck, and R. W. Toler. 1973. 'Floratam' St. Augustinegrass: A fast growing new variety for ornamental turf resistant to St. Augustine decline and chinch bugs. Fla. Agr. Exp. Stn. Circ. S-224.
Nutter, G. C. and R. J. Allen, Jr. 1960. Floratine St. Augustinegrass: A new variety for ornamental turf. Fla. Agr. Exp. Stn. Circ S-123.
Peacock, C. H. and A. E. Dudeck. 1981. The effects of shade on morphological and physiological parameters of St. Augustinegrass cultivars. p. 493-500. In R. W. Sheard (ed.) Proc. Fourth Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 19-23 July 1981. Ontario Agric. Col., Univ. Guelph and Int. Turfgrass Soc., Guelph, Ontario.
Powell, J. B. and R. W. Toler. 1980. Induced mutations of 'Floratam' St. Augustinegrass. Crop Sci. 20:644-646.
Reeves, S. A., Jr., and G. G. McBee. 1972. Nutritional influences on cold hardiness of St. Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum). Agron. J. 64:447-450.
Reinert, J. A., B. D. Bruton, and R. W. Toler. 1980. Resistance of St. Augustinegrass to southern chinch bug and St. Augustine Decline Strain of Panicum Mosaic Virus. J. Econ. Entomol. 73:602-604.
Reinert, J. A., P. Busey, and F. G. Bilz. 1986. Old world St. Augustinegrasses resistant to the southern chinch bug (Heteroptera:Lygaeidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 79:1073-1075.
Reinert, J. A. and A. E. Dudeck. 1974. Southern chinch bug resistance in St. Augustinegrass. J. Econ. Entomol. 67:275-277.
Reinert, J. A., R. W. Toler, B. D. Bruton, and P. Busey. 1981. Retention of resistance by mutants of 'Floratam' St. Augustinegrass to the southern chinch bug and St. Augustine Decline. Crop Sci. 21:464-466.
Riordan, T. P., V. D. Meier, J. A. Long, and J. T. Gruis. 1980. Registration of Seville St. Augustinegrass. Crop Sci. 20:824-825.
Sauer, J. D. 1972. Revision of Stenotaphrum (Gramineae:Paniceae) with attention to its historical geography. Brittonia 24:202-222.
Wilson, C. A., J. A. Reinert, and A. E. Dudeck. 1977. Winter survival of St. Augustine grasses in North Mississippi. S. Nurserymen's Assoc. Res. Conf. Ann. Rep. 22:195-198.
Winstead, C. W. and C. Y. Ward. 1974. Persistence of southern turfgrasses in shade environment. p. 221-230. In E. C. Roberts (ed.) Proc. Second Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., Blacksburg, VA. 19-21 June 1973. ASA and CSSA, Madison, WI.


Return to top

* The information was adapted fromBusey, P. 1989. Progress and benefits to humanity from breeding warm-season grasses for turf. p. 49-70 in: D. A. Sleper, K. H. Asay, and J. F. Pedersen (eds.). Contributions from breeding forage and turf grasses. CSSA Spec. Publ. 15, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.


Contact us