Turfgrass Science Florida Turf Home Pages

Welcome to bermudagrass

 

Planting an experimental grass on a south Florida fairway.














Bermuda home

Bentgrass vs. bermuda?

Fast greens

Links

Origins

Production

Publications

Spray calculator

Frequently Asked Questions

Greens cultivars

Weeds













Origin and Early History *

Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) was introduced to the United States from Africa by 1751 (Hanson, 1972a).  The high growth rate of this genus (Busey and Myers, 1979) provides it with rapid colonization in disturbed areas and quick recovery from traffic damage caused in sports activities. It was shown that if logarithmic growth rates could be sustained for 1 year (e.g., through ideal environment and frequent division), then "it would be possible for 1 m2 of grass to cover an area equal to 50% of the land area of the world" (Busey and Myers, 1979).
 Carolina farmers of the 1700's preferred it as a forage, calling it "crop grass or crab grass (Syntherisma)", according to Drayton's View of South Carolina (Gray, 1958).  Bermudagrass was planted on golf courses (Carrier, 1927) and lawns (Enlow and Stokes, 1929) in Florida at least by the 1920's.  'St. Lucie' was the first turf bermudagrass recognized in the U.S. (Tracy, 1917). St. Lucie was a slender dwarf plant used in Florida lawns, but it was not hardy as far north as middle Georgia.  The fine-leaved texture of bermudagrass was recognized as an advantage for use in lawns, but its intolerance to shade was also noted (Enlow and Stokes, 1929).  Arizona grown (probably common, C. dactylon) seed was planted in most golf course fairways, greens, and tees in Florida in the 1920's (R. A. Bair, personal communication).

Species and Cultivars

Eight species of Cynodon are recognized, of which turf types are included only in the 2n = 36 C. dactylon (L.) Pers. var. dactylon ("common bermudagrass"), the 2n = 18 C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy ("African bermudagrass"), and their 2n = 27 interspecific hybrid C. X magenissii Hurcombe (= C. dactylon X C. transvaalensis) (Harlan et al., 1970a).  My interpretation of C. X magenissii being equivalent to C. dactylon X C. transvaalensis, and reciprocals, has not been recognized by taxonomists, but should be studied.  This tri-partite interpretation of turf species relationships in Cynodon is a simplified classification based on incomplete knowledge.  Extensive studies of genetic variation have emphasized wide crosses (Harlan et al., 1969) and forage development, and very little documentation is available regarding the taxonomy and relationships of cultivated turf types.   Cytological evidence suggests that C. transvaalensis could be considered a botanical variety of C. dactylon, but that it is distinctive in geography, ecology, and morphology (Harlan et al., 1970b). Taxonomy of bermudagrass is helpful in understanding its breeding development.
 Early selection work emphasized C. dactylon.   Probably much of the germplasm base for early selections was from seeded plantings. At one time all the commercial seed used in the United States came from Australia (Tracy, 1917).  The first test plantings were reported to have been made around 1918 at East Lake Country Club by C. V. Piper of the United States Golf Association Green Section.   Out of this came the 'Atlanta' strain about 1924 (Latham, 1966).  Additional clones were selected by golf course superintendents in the United States and the Republic of South Africa. There was little organized breeding. Important cultivars included 'Ormond', by R. A. Bair, released in Florida in 1962; 'Royal Cape', by C. M. Murray, Republic of South Africa, in 1930; and 'Tiflawn' (T-57), by G. W. Burton, Georgia, distributed in 1952 (officially released 1956).  Ormond and Tiflawn have had a continuing success for use in recreational turf.  Tiflawn tolerates heavy traffic, requires little fertilization, is fast spreading, and is generally disease and insect resistant (Hanson, 1972a).  Ormond is blue-green, competitive, and performs moderately well under conditions of natural pest infestation (Scapteriscus mole crickets, especially) and suboptimal N fertilization (Busey, 1986).
 The foregoing cultivars are sometimes lumped together as common bermudagrass.  The name "common bermudagrass" is confusing and questionable.  It refers in the U. S. to a landrace cultivar, which is produced as seed in Arizona and other states, is widely recognized, but has not been adequately described.  When used as a collective term, "common" can also refer to any C. dactylon. In some usages, "common" has become synonymous with any seed propagated bermudagrass. Because of its coarse habit of growth, there is relatively little interest in using plants of this group in the subtropics, where some of the sterile hybrids (below) can be used. In temperate areas where cold can be a problem, C. dactylon is better adapted than other Cynodon species, and there has been a continuing effort to improve cold hardiness and turf characteristics. In 1930 A. B. Dorrance started to select bermudagrass for cold hardiness in Augusta, Michigan (Hanson, 1972b). 'Midiron', developed by R. A. Keen, Kansas State University, shows considerably less winter-kill than several other cultivars (Juska and Murray, 1974). Burton (1974) produced hundreds of F1 hybrids involving a cold hardy Berlin collection. The cultivar 'Vamont' was released from Virginia for its cold hardiness. Wofford and Baltensperger (Wofford and Baltsenberger, 1985) performed extensive heritability tests for turfgrass characteristics in C. dactylon.
 Clones of the 2n=18 C. transvaalensis, including 'Uganda', were introduced to the United States. They crossed with the naturalized 2n=36 C. dactylon to produce sterile 2n=27 hybrids. The products of these crosses became useful cultivars, such as 'Sunturf', 'Everglades-1', 'Gene Tift' (='Bayshore'), and a long line of successful Tifton hybrids. In general turf usage, "hybrid" bermudagrass has come to mean any interspecific hybrid involving C. dactylon and C. transvaalensis. The first Tifton interspecific hybrid was 'Tiffine'. Tiffine was a cross of C. transvaalensis X C. dactylon (Forbes and Burton, 1963). It was too stemmy for use on putting greens (Latham, 1966).
 A remarkably successful hybrid cultivar 'Tifgreen' (Tifton-328,  C. dactylon X C. transvaalensis) was officially released in 1956, and it made an excellent putting surface. It was followed by 'Tifway' (Tifton-419,  C. transvaalensis X C. dactylon X ) in 1960. Tifway had a stiffer, more erect growth habit, and greater pest and wear resistance than Tifgreen. In 1974 Tifgreen and Tifway represented 78% of the areas planted to specific grasses on Florida golf course greens, tees, and fairways (Anonymous, 1976). One must be cautious in accepting that estimate, which was based on interviews of turfgrass managers, because I have observed that some areas of golf course fairways and sod fields that are claimed to be Tifway are actually Ormond (Busey, personal observation). The leaf blades of Tifway are pilose, with 10 or more hairs on both surfaces, whereas those of Ormond are sparingly pilose (Thompson, 1965).

Clonal Variation

Clonal off-types were discovered in Tifgreen, and they were presumed to have arisen as spontaneous mutations. Two off-types were selected as cultivars, 'Tifdwarf' (USDA Coastal Plains Experiment Station, Tifton, Georgia, 1965) and 'Pee Dee 102' (South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, 1968). Under close cutting Tifdwarf can provide very rapid golf ball roll. The problem of vegetative sporting in "hybrid" bermudagrass is widespread, but has not been adequately documented. Because of the rare nature of mutation events, it is not likely that one could prove that mutations were involved, to the exclusion of alternative hypotheses (e.g., contamination of breeding stock). I have been shown several instances of off-types, which had been observed, during the growing in of planting stock. This suggests that the immediate problem may be contamination of planting stock, even though mutations ultimately may have been involved.
 Maintenance of genetic purity is a major problem for golf course superintendents, turfgrass producers, and plant breeders. "Clonal degeneration" is not an isolated phenomenon in bermudagrass, but has been noticed in potatoes and other crops, in which a "running out" may occur. Several different phenomenon can occur, including the "risk of multiplying mutations or cryptically diseased material" (Simmonds, 1972). Clonal selection also allows for openings of genetic vulnerability, because of the fundamental genetic similarity of clonal off-types.
 Golf course superintendents have continued to make new vegetative selections from the off-types that they find. This will be a viable source of variability in quality characteristics. A synthetic approach to this goal has been the use of non-ionizing radiation, e.g., gamma rays, to create artificial mutations. Beginning in 1970 Powell et al. (Powell et al., 1974) irradiated thousands of rhizomes of Tifton bermudagrass cultivars. Two clonal cultivars were released from this work, 'Tifway-II' in 1981 (Burton, 1985) and 'Tifgreen-II' in 1983. Tissue culture techniques may now be useful for increasing bermudagrass clonal variations, because plant regeneration has been shown to occur from calli (Ahn, 1985).

Environmental Stresses

There is considerable undocumented field information on pest resistance of bermudagrass cultivars, which has served as a basis for cultivar descriptions and releases. The few published studies have been based on individual experiments involving a small number of bermudagrasses grown in containers. Those experiments have not been adequately correlated with field studies. One might speculate (Busey, 1986) that the low-maintenance adaptation of Ormond and some plant introductions (e.g., PI-291586) is related to pest resistance, i.e., Scapteriscus mole crickets (Reinert and Busey, 1984), ectoparasitic nematodes (Tarjan and Busey, 1985), tropical sod webworm, Herpetogramma phaeopteralis Guenee (Reinert and Busey, 1983), and bermudagrass mite, Eriophyes cynodoniensis Sayed (Reinert et al., 1978). Unfortunately, it is difficult to extrapolate to field level resistance without more information. For highly mobile grass pests such as caterpillars (lepidopteran larvae), cafeteria style grazing trials (Leuck et al., 1968; Reinert and Busey, 1984) are of undetermined value. Insects in the field are generally confronted with turfgrass monocultures, and the element of nonpreference which is noticeable in controlled screening trials would be of little or no impact in the field, unless it is correlated with other resistance mechanisms.
 Physiological studies were done to select for better adaptive range for bermudagrass. 'No-Mow' (FB-137) bermudagrass is more tolerant to shade than 'Tifway', based on color and ground cover ratings when both grasses are grown at 35% and 25% incident light (McBee and Hold, 1966). 'Brookings' bermudagrass has significantly higher regrowth than seven other cultivars, when all are subjected to -4 to -11 degrees Centigrade soil temperatures (Ibitayo et al., 1981). Electrolyte loss curve data suggested that the low temperature kill point of hardened material ranges from -7 to -17 degrees Centigrade, depending on the bermudagrass cultivar. Salt tolerance differences exist among bermudagrasses (Dudeck et al., 1983), with Tifdwarf showing maximum root growth at moderately high (20.5 dS m-1) electrical conductivity (EC), or about 47% the concentration of seawater. Other cultivars show maximum root growth at lower EC values. One of the advantages of bermudagrass is its high N responsiveness, which provides a recuperative ability against wear and herbivory. Yet some work has been done in Florida, New Mexico, and other locations, to select for adapted, low-fertility requiring bermudagrasses. Differences in air pollution (ozone and peroxyacetyl nitrate) tolerance exist among bermudagrasses, with Tifgreen being intermediate in response, while Santa Ana and Common are not injured (Youngner and Nudge, 1980).

References

Ahn, B. J., F. H. Huang, and J. W. King. 1985. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis in common bermudagrass tissue culture. Crop Sci. 25:1107-1109.
Anonymous. 1976. Florida turfgrass survey 1974. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee, FL.
Burton, G. W. 1974. Breeding bermudagrass for turf. p. 18-22. In E. C. Roberts (ed.) Proc. Second Int. Turfgrass Res Conf., Blacksburg, VA. 19-21 June 1973. ASA and CSSA, Madison, WI.
Busey, P. 1986. Bermudagrass germplasm adaptation to natural pest infestation and suboptimal nitrogen fertilization. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:630-634.
Busey, P. and B. J. Myers. 1979. Growth rates of turfgrass propagated vegetatively. Agron. J. 71:817-821.
Carrier, L. 1927. Florida greenkeeping. Natl. Greenkeeper, Oct. 1927. p. 20 and 25.
Dudeck, A. E., S. Singh, C. E. Giordano, T. A. Nell, and D. B. McConnell. 1983. Effects of sodium chloride on Cynodon turfgrasses. Agron. J. 75:927-930.
Enlow, C. R. and W. E. Stokes. 1929. Lawns in Florida. Florida Agr. Exp. Stn. Bul. 209.
Forbes, I., Jr., and G. W. Burton. 1963. Chromosome numbers and meiosis in some Cynodon species and hybrids. Crop Sci. 3:75-79.
Gray, L. C. 1958. History of agriculture in the southern United States to 1860. Peter Smith, Gloucester, Mass. Reprinted as Publ. 430 by the Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Hanson, A. A. 1972a. Breeding of grasses. p. 36-52. In V. B. Youngner and C. M. McKell (eds.) The biology and utilization of grasses. Academic Press, New York.
Hanson, A. A. 1972b. Grass varieties in the United States. USDA Agr. Hdbk. 170.
Harlan, J. R. and J. M. J. de Wet. 1969. Sources of variation in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Crop Sci. 9:774-778.
Harlan, J. R., J. M. J. de Wet, W. W. Huffine, and J. R. Deakin. 1970a. A guide to the species of Cynodon (Gramineae). Oklahoma State Univ. Bull. B-673.
Harlan, J. R., J. M. J. de Wet, K. M. Rawal, M. R. Felder, and W. L. Richardson. 1970b. Cytogenetic studies in Cynodon L. C. Rich. (Gramineae). Crop Sci. 10:288-291.
Ibitayo, O. O., J. D. Butler, and M. J. Burke. 1981. Cold hardiness of bermudagrass and Paspalum vaginatum Sw. HortScience 16:683-684.
Juska, F. V. and J. J. Murray. 1974. Performance of bermudagrasses in the transition zone as affected by potassium and nitrogen. p. 149-154. In E. C. Roberts (ed.) Proc. Second Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., Blacksburg, VA. 19-21 June 1973. ASA and CSSA, Madison, WI.
Latham, J. M., Jr. 1966. Better bermudagrass greens and tees. Milwaukee Sewerage Commission Bull no. 6, Milwaukee, WI.
Leuck, D. B., C. M. Taliaferro, G. W. Burton, R. L. Burton, and M. C. Bowman. 1968. Resistance in bermudagrass to the fall armyworm. J. Econ. Entomol. 61:1321-1322.
McBee, G. G. and E. C. Holt. 1966. Shade tolerance studies on bermudagrass and other turfgrasses. Agron. J. 58:523-525.
Powell, J. B., G. W. Burton, and J. R. Young. 1974. Mutation induced in vegetatively propagated turf bermudagrasses by gamma radiation. Crop Sci. 14:327-330.
Reinert, J. A. and P. Busey. 1983. Resistance of bermudagrass selections to the tropical sod webworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environ. Entomol. 12:1844-1845.
Reinert, J. A. and P. Busey. 1984. Resistant varieties pp. 35-40. In: Walker, T. J. (ed.) Mole crickets in Florida. Univ. Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 846.
Reinert, J. A., A. E. Dudeck, and G. H. Snyder. 1978. Resistance in bermudagrass to the bermudagrass mite. Environ. Entomol. 7:885-888.
Simmonds, N. W. 1972. Principles of crop improvement. Longman, London.
Tarjan, A. C. and P. Busey. 1985. Genotypic variability of bermudagrass damage by ectoparasitic nematodes. HortScience 20:675-676.
Thompson, W. R., Jr. 1965. Vegetative identification of 16 varieties of turf-type bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.). Bull. Fla. Turf-Grass Assn. 12(1):6-8.
Tracy, S. M. 1917. Bermuda grass. United States Dept. of Agric. Farmers' Bull. 814., USDA, Washington, DC.
Wofford, D. S. and A. A. Baltensperger. 1985. Heritability estimates for turfgrass characteristics in bermudagrass. Crop Sci. 25:133-136.
Youngner, V. B. and F. J. Nudge. 1980. Air pollution oxidant effects on cool-season and warm-season turfgrasses. Agron. J. 72:169-170.

(return to top)

* The information was adapted fromBusey, P. 1989. Progress and benefits to humanity from breeding warm-season grasses for turf. p. 49-70 in: D. A. Sleper, K. H. Asay, and J. F. Pedersen (eds.). Contributions from breeding forage and turf grasses. CSSA Spec. Publ. 15, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.


Contact us